Hugonnier, continual learning, mixing cultures, and poverty

Dear Faculty,

Today is Thanksgiving and it is a normal school day here.  We will celebrate Thanksgiving tonight, but I thought I would compose a new post as a way to connect to the USA on this holiday.  I want to share some insights from an article by Bernard Hugonnier, Globalization and Education.  He is the Deputy Director for Education in the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) based in Paris.  Some of his points relate to the in-service day on Monday.   His article was one of the few articles that I have read that focused on teachers as well as curriculum and students.  He had three points about continual learning for adults, mixing foreign cultures, and poverty.

Hugonnier argues that with increasing world economic interdependence, “people need to acquire or update their knowledge and skills more often than before.”  You all have probably felt that recently.  In the technology world, for example, Holderness has installed SmartBoards, adroitly switched from First Class to GMail/Google Docs and moved from Wikis to Moodle.  And all these ICT platforms will probably all change again, soon.  It can spin one’s head.  In addition, the increase of international students is pushing us all to “update knowledge and skills” to work with these students from foreign cultures.  The informal survey the faculty completed last spring raised important questions such as: how do we effectively teach students whose mother tongue is not English, or how do we respect and work with different cultural norms?  I imagine that next Monday’s in-service will address some of those points. As Hugonnier concludes, “educators must possess intercultural skills if they are to pass these on to learners.”

Several responses in the faculty survey also expressed worry about how the increase of international students could affect the traditional culture of Holderness.  That’s a good question.  Hugonnier points out that “societies worldwide are integrating elements of foreign cultures at an unprecedented speed,” but he also emphasizes that “the introduction of a foreign culture is not a threat to the host country’s culture but, on the contrary, an asset on which the country should capitalize.”  I take a biological perspective on this one.  The healthiest ecological systems include a diversity of species.  This diversity of species promotes the evolution and growth of the system.  (My apologies to biologists for that crude summary)  Similarly, education happens when people interact with diverse ideas, people and experiences.  New interactions with international students will help the school evolve.

On the flip side, as I have travelled and watched excellent international schools in action, they all establish their own core experiences that are unique to their school.  The programs can range from mountain expeditions, to committing to an equal spread of nationalities, to emphasizing multiple language fluency, to promoting design and technology, or to consciously weaving the traditional culture of their city into their program.  These schools create a dynamic interaction between diverse international cultures and the school’s long-standing core experiences.  For Holderness, that can mean recognizing how programs such as orientation hike, pantry, special programs, Halloween costumes, etc. need to be part of every student’s experience.

Hugonnier then discusses poverty.  He explains how over the past twenty years, the number and percentage of people living in poverty in the world has decreased.  At the same time, the per capita income of the wealthiest ten percent of the world has grown even faster.  In other words: while total poverty has decreased, the gap between the most wealthy and the most poor has increased.  (I think we need some graphs to help explain that point.)  He warns against two pitfalls: elitism and mass education.  Education cannot only be for those who can afford it, nor can there be a one-size fits all education as a means to educate everyone.  His point about mass education connects to the previous paragraph: schools need to build upon their core experiences and not try to teach to one big exam or teach exactly like other schools.

Maintaining the uniqueness of a place like Holderness is easy to understand, but Hugonnier’s point about poverty also illuminates a difference between diversity at Holderness and at international schools.   All of the international schools make a smaller commitment to financial aid.  The people I have met are astounded when I tell them that 40% of our students receive aid and that we give out about $3MM of aid each year.   The schools I have visited have made a huge commitment to international diversity but a negligent commitment to economic diversity in their student bodies.  All these schools do have impressive outreach and service programs, but I am proud of Holderness’ effort to extend its education to many economic levels.  In fact, many of our celebrations of alumni profile students who received aid from Holderness. We are trying to avoid elitism and mass education.

So, on this Thanksgiving Day, I am thankful to work at a school that commits full days to faculty education, that works to interact with different cultures, that shares wonderful core experiences, and that reaches out to people from different economic levels.

-Jory

This post was more philosophical, wasn’t it? (And no pictures) I always appreciate hearing any of your thoughts via email or on jorymacomber.com.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Holderness Faculty Letters. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Hugonnier, continual learning, mixing cultures, and poverty

  1. jdmacomber says:

    Jory,

    Happy Thanksgiving back atcha! Your post is indeed philosophical…and it should be. You are only a few months into your sabbatical and look at the benefits already realized from having the chance to get other inputs and then reflect and process them.

    You mention that the pace of change in ICT platforms can spin one’s heads. This phenomenon (of constant change in the platforms and the rules) does not feel comfortable. Referring back to “High Noon” and the simple chart of pace of change/ability to adapt, one can expect this unease to accelerate – and to make we humans (and our institutions!) less and less comfortable. One of the mandates then would seem to be, “how can we teach our students to adapt to this pace of change…” which will continue all of their lives?
    http://jorymacomber.com/2011/09/19/what-is-a-global-education/

    As an aside, from a political point of view, one might also expect more and more backward looking comfort-rhetoric from candidates, as they reach out to a segment of population who are uncomfortable with the rate and types of change and would rather just shut out that noise. Your colleagues will have a chance to track the New Hampshire Primary conversation and map the correlation (or negative correlation) to the magnitude of forces in the global economy and in global education which you reference.

    You go on to discuss the culture of Holderness. The ecological system analogy might be continued in several aspects. One is that successful ecosystems adapt to circumstances. Another is that succesful arborists and horticulturalists nurture and propagate the plants they want, with conscious intent. They don’t just let every specimen remain. Similarly, the selection of programs you list as framing tradition are not necessarily part of a coherent plan; they just seeded, propagated, and grew. Not all of them are equally worthy just because they are here. Holderness can be quite intentional about which of samples like orientation hike, pantry, special programs, Halloween costumes form the type of forward thinking integrated experience you want and which ones are just kinda there since they’ve always been there and on an individual basis they are all sorta worthy. You can collectively create the garden you want.

    The sample programs in your list strike me as being about some sort of level-setting, equality, common experience, things-all-kids-can-do, homogenizing activities. If the school selects and nurtures the “best” of those (by some measure to be determined) then you should be able to a) train forward looking children who can cope with rapid change b) assimilate many other cultures and c) continue to intake a diversity of nationalties and socio-economic background.

    With respect to gap between most wealthy and most poor, you ask for graphs. OK…. The global standard is the GINI coefficient of inequality, researched and published by the World Bank. A GINI coefficient of zero would mean everyone in the nation has equal wealth. A GINI coefficient of 100 means one person has all the wealth. In the developed world the coefficient is between 30 and 40 and is increasing. For way more than you want to know, go to http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/EXTPA/0,,contentMDK:20238991~menuPK:492138~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:430367,00.html

    A more digestible set of charts is from this WordPress blogger whom I’ve never heard of before now:
    http://sofistic.wordpress.com/2009/01/03/income-distribution-in-the-us-1967-to-2007/

    There are also good articles on Wikipedia but I assume you don’t let Holderness students cite Wikipedia in refernce works :-)

    As you have noted, the commitment to economic diversity is negligent in the European and Asian schools you have visited. The idea that some “equitable” spread of wealth is desirable is a very American phenomenon. The idea that egalitarianism, opportunity, and the outreach to all economic classes is important could remain a core Holderness value. The entity may find itself having to fight to make that remain true. But what a great story about American exceptionalism and also the Episcopal roots of the school.
    http://jorymacomber.com/2011/09/23/jean-calvin-and-international-education/

    Between the programs that establish an intentional culture, the continued commitment in practice to intake for economic diversity, and a curriculum that explicitly prepares students for a world that changes faster and faster could create a compelling case statement for Holderness. There will be families who don’t find the above to be attractive….too bad.

    Thank you for philosophizing on a day of giving thanks. We all enjoy watching your thinking and feeling expand during this time away.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s